Socioeconomic Essays - 1106 Words

Socioeconomic Essay To help facilitate the growth of small businesses Federal Government procurement requires their Contracting Officers to comply with applicable socioeconomic laws and regulations that do not apply to commercial contracting. The socioeconomic goals set forth by these laws, which pertain only to federal contracting and are integrated into the FAR, ensure there is constant economic growth for the U.S economy as well. These goals consist of making awards to what is considered, set-aside programs, and includes small businesses participating in the 8(a) Business Development Program, Historically Underutilized Business Zones (HUBZone) Program, Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business (SDVOSB) Program, or the Women-Owned†¦show more content†¦One particular program of interest is that being the HubZone Program. HubZones consists of businesses that are located in areas defined by the federal government as being an area that is economically depressed due to high unemployment rat es. HUBZones are categorized by the SBA as being in one or more of the following: †¢ A qualified census tract. †¢ A qualified non-metropolitan county with a median household income of less than 80 percent of the State median household income or with an unemployment rate of not less than 140 percent of the statewide average based on US Department of Labor recent data. †¢ Or on lands within the boundaries of federally recognized Indian reservations. In order for a Small Business to qualify as a HUBZone business, it must meet all of the following criteria to qualify for the HUBZone program: †¢ For starters it must be located in a historically underutilized business zone or HUBZone. †¢ It must be owned and controlled by one or more US Citizens, and †¢ Lastly, at least 35% of its employees must reside in a HUBZone area. The US Small Business Administration regulates and implements the program and determines which businesses are eligible to receive HUBZone contracts, they maintain current listings of qualified HUBZone small businesses that Federal agencies can use to locate vendors, settleShow MoreRelatedThe Socioeconomic Status And Parenting Essay1796 Words   |  8 Pagesthesis statement. I did use â€Å"the socioeconomic status difference is the key causation† as my thesis, but I guess it is not clear to my audiences. I want to prove that socioeconomic status difference is the main causation of achievement gap in this paper. He also point out that he could see why parenting is important for the kids, but it is hard to tell the connection between socioeconomic status and parenting. So I revised to thesis statement to â€Å"the socioeconomic status and parenting are the keysRead MoreSocioeconomic Status Essay3746 Words   |  15 PagesSocioeconomic Status and Child Development Socioeconomic status (SES) is one of the most widely studied constructs in the social sciences. Several ways of measuring SES have been proposed, but most include some quantification of family income, parental education, and occupational status. Research shows that SES is associated with a wide variety of health, cognitive, and socioemotional outcomes in children, with effects beginning prior to birth and continuing into adulthood. A variety of mechanismsRead MoreDifferences Between Socioeconomic Classes And The Achievement Gap Between Students1234 Words   |  5 PagesBenjamin Leung Research and Composition - R3 Magistra Glaser January 17, 2017 Research Question: In what ways and to what extent do the differences in income between socioeconomic classes influence the achievement gap between students in America? Describe the achievement gap between students in America Background information of the achievement gap. The Glossary of Education Reform defines the achievement gap as â€Å"any significant and persistent disparity in academic performance or educational attainmentRead MoreSocioeconomic Status and Health Issues1380 Words   |  5 Pages Socioeconomic status (a measurement of income, education, and occupation) measures an individuals social standing in society. Low socioeconomic status is often linked to a depravity of essential material resources and heightened psychological stress variables. The importance of researching the effects is underlined by its association to a number of adverse health effects and the increasing prevalence of poverty within many countries in the world. Recent studies have investigated the possibleRead MoreSocioeconomic Status And Health Care933 Words   |  4 PagesAccording to About.com (Elizabeth Boskey, 2014), socioeconomic status is defined as a arrangement of elements including income, level of education, and occupation. It is a way of looking a t how individuals or families fit into society using economic and social measures that have been shown to influence individuals health and well-being. Socioeconomic status is broken into three categories: high, middle, and low social economic status. These three categories are used to describe the three areasRead MoreChidhood Development and Socioeconomic Status1171 Words   |  5 PagesWhites or Asian families. According to recent research, the wealthy is equal to the least fortunate of all 41 million African Americans’ in the country. This has only increased because statistics show that in the past couple of decades, America’s socioeconomic inequality has changed drastically. Part has to do with wealth; the more money you invest in your education, the better education the person will have, which usually means a better paying job. The majority in this case for holding most of the wealthRead MoreSocioeconomic Status And Children Behaviour Essay1270 Words   |   6 PagesSocioeconomic Status and Children Behaviour Introduction: In popular media its common to see children being influenced by many things around them, including what kind of environment they are grown up in. Socioeconomic status can be a huge influence on a child’s upbringing, in either a positive or negative way. A high socioeconomic status produces a better child according to most people because they have factors that include; social connections, good employment, and a happy family. These are theRead MoreSocioeconomic Status And Access For Sports1509 Words   |  7 PagesSocioeconomic status (SES) is the combination of social and economical measures of a person’s work experience or of a family social and economical position in relation to others. The socioeconomic class is divided into three categories: upper class, middle class, and lower class, which is used to describe the three areas a person or a family. From each category, the person’s income, education, and occupation can be assessed. Sports provide many benef its. It brings people together, keeps themRead MoreThe Effects Of Socioeconomics On Children s Children1743 Words   |  7 Pageslight to the turmoil that socioeconomics brings upon children and that they need to endure to survive in this society. When it comes to socioeconomics, children are the utmost affected. Socioeconomics has long term effects, prevalently distresses children in school and in development. Through my friend’s experience that he has shared with me, it has allowed me to notice the harrowing effects that socioeconomics has on children. First, one may ask exactly what is socioeconomic status and other termsRead MoreThe Effects Of Socioeconomic Status On Multicultural Social Work Practice Essay1264 Words   |  6 Pagesconditions, the racial crisis, and financial difficulties. Unfortunately, there are so many that are not recognizing these mental obstacles and are carrying on, baring the weight as if these feelings are normal. This qualifies as Socioeconomic Status (SES). Socioeconomic Status encompasses all of those factors that exceed one s physical health,......... social conditions, ...... one s sense of well-being...... They are often hindered in their attempts at conquering the disparities that permeate

Tern Paper Compare Two Companies Free Essays

Kazakhstan University of Management, Economics, and Strategic Research Bang College of Business MBA program Term Paper: Financial analysis of â€Å"JSC Shubarkol komir† and â€Å"JSC SatCompany† Prepared by: 20101675 Kim Jonghon 20091481 Nurtas Kadyrbayev Instructor: M Mujibul Haque, Ph. D. Executive Summary This paper provides an analysis and evaluation of the current and prospective profitability, liquidity and financial stability of JSC â€Å"ShubarkolKomir† and JSC â€Å"SatCompany†. We will write a custom essay sample on Tern Paper: Compare Two Companies or any similar topic only for you Order Now Methods of analysis include trend and vertical analyses as well as ratios such as Debt, Current and Quick ratios. Other calculations include rates of return on Shareholders’ Equity and Total Assets and earnings per share to name a few. All calculations can be found in the appendices. The report finds the prospects of the company in its current position are not positive. The major areas of weakness require further investigation and remedial action by management. Recommendations discussed include: – improving the average collection period for accounts receivable · – improving/increasing inventory turnover · – reducing prepayments and perhaps increasing inventory levels The report also investigates the fact that the analysis conducted has limitations. Some of the limitations include: forecasting figures are not provided nature and type of company is not known nor the current economic conditions data limitations as not enough information is provided or enough detail. For example, monthly details not known results are based on past performances not present. Acknowledgement We wish to express our sincere gratitude to Dr. M. MujibulHaque, for providing us an opportunity to do our project, and for guidance and encouragement in carrying out this project work. We are heartily thankful that he support from the preliminary to the concluding level enabled us to develop and understanding of the subject. Lastly, We offer our regards to all of those who supported us in any respect during the completion of the project. Dr. M. MujibulHaque Professor, Dean of Bang colledge of Business KIMEP, 4 Abay Ave. Dear Dr. Haque: We are submitting herewith our term paper entitled JSC â€Å"ShubarkolKomir† and JSC â€Å"SatCompany†. The main purpose of this paper is to master a set of concept to make effective financial analysis. The paper shows detail approaches and methodology which are was applied during our paper. We hope that this paper will merit your approval. Sincerely, Nurtas Kadyrbayev Kim Jonghon Contents Title page †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦. 1 Executive Summary †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦ 2 Acknowledgement †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦ 2 Letter of Transmittal â € ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦ Table of Contents †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦. 4 Table of Figure/Tables †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦.. 5 I. Introduction †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã ¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦. 6 1. Objective †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦ 2. Scope †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦.. 6 3. Methodology †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦. 6 4. Limitation †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦ 6 II. Findings and Analysis †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦.. 6 1. Shubarkolkomir† and â€Å"SatCompany† companies overview †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦.. 7 2. Du Pont analysis †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦. 8 3. Working capital policy †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦.. 9 4. Capital Structure Policy †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦ 17 5. Dividend Policy †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦.. †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦. 18 6. Break-even analysis †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚ ¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦.. 23 7. P/E ratio analysis †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦. 24 8. Vertical analyses †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦. 25 9. Trend analysis †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦.. 5 III. Summary and Recommendations †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚ ¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦ 33 References †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦.. 35 Appendices †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦.. 36 List of Tables and Figures Table 1 Du Pont analysis †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã ¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦.. 0 Table 2 Working capital †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦.. 11 Table 3 Liquidity analysis †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦.. 11 Table 4 Debt analysis †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦.. 12 Table 5 Profitability analysis †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â ‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦. 3 Table 6 Efficiency analysis †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦ 15 Table 7 Capital structure †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦ 17 Table 8 Capitalization rate †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦ 17 Table 9 Dividend policy ratio †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚ ¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦ 2 Table 10 Break-even †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦ 23 Table 11 P/E ratio †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦. 24 Table 12 Vertical analysis (Income Statement) †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦.. 25 Table 13 Trend analysis (Income state ment) †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦.. 25 Table 14 Vertical analysis (Balance Sheet) †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦. 6 Table 15 Trend analysis (Balance Sheet) †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦. 29 Table 16 Summary †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦ 33 Figure 1 Return on equity †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦.. 10 Figure 2 Current Assets/Total Assets †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦. 11 Figure 3 Current ratio †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦.. 2 Figure 4 Acid-test ratio †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦ 12 Figure 5 Debt analysis †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦ †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦ 12 Figure 6 Sales growth rate †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦ 14 Figure 7 Profitability analysis †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦.. 4 Figure 8 Efficiency analysis †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦.. 16 Figure 9 Divide nd policy ratios †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦ 22 Figure 10 Leverage analysis †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦ 23 Figure 11 Price per share/EPS †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦.. 24 I. Introduction A financial statement analysis is an important business activity that helps the top management assesses the stability and profitability of the business. It is important to carry out a financial analysis, as it enables the management to decide upon the continuation or discontinuation of a particular project and to take decisions regarding the purchase of raw material and machinery, investments, lending, and so on. Financial statement analysis involves the comparison of information of one entity over different periods of time or the comparison of information of different entities during the same period. The four main statements that are analyzed during the procedure include the balance sheet, income statement, statement of owner’s equity, and statement of cash flows. Based on financial statements for past three years, they are 2010, 2009, 2008 which were available on Kazakhstan Stock Exchange (KASE) of each company, we make a financial analysis. We have applied 3 methods to evaluate the position of these companies through methods like ratio analysis, vertical analysis, trend analysis, and common-size analysis. Limitations of this paper that there is considerable subjectivity involved as there is no theory as to what should be the right number for the various ratios. Further, it is hard to reach a definite conclusion when some of the ratios are favorable and some are unfavorable. Ratios are based on financial statements that reflect the past and not the future. Unless the ratios are stable, one cannot make reasonable projections about the future trend. Financial statements provide an assessment of the costs and not value. For example, the market value of items may be very different from the cost figure given in the balance sheet. II. Findings and Analysis Joint Stock Company â€Å"ShubarkolKomir† is one of the producers of steam coal largest in Kazakhstan. Shubarkol (from Kazakh shubar – spotty, kol – the lake) – spotty lake. JCC ShubarkolKomir was created by mergering of Open joint stock company â€Å"Shubarkolskiirazrez† and open joint stock company â€Å"Shubarkolskoe transportation management†. JSC ShubarkolKomir activity also covers pits on production of a construction stone, coal processing, operation of access roads, rail transportation, shunting works, and also production and water sale. The company managed by Board of directors. Chief executive officer setted by board of directors. Form of ownership of JSC â€Å"ShubarkolKomir† is private. Joint Stock Company  « SAT Komir  »is formed in November, 2009. Enterprise primary activity is working out of coal deposits. – Lines of activity: †¢ Investigation and working out of coal deposits. †¢ Extraction and realization coal for the industry and household consumption. – The purposes: †¢ To achieve good results in development of the coal industry. †¢ Successfully to solve problems on maintenance of internal requirements of the country in firm fuel and to an exit on the world market. The company develops the Kumyskuduksky site of the Verhnesokursky deposit of brown coal in the Karaganda in the Republic of ?azakhstan. Balance stocks of a site make more than 356 million tons of coal, from which 124,3 million tons are considered on categories, And, In and ?1. On a geological structure, consistency of capacity of layers and qualities of coal, the Kumyskuduksky site is carried to 1 group, according to classification of stocks of deposits of firm minerals. Coal mining is carried out by open way, horizontal ledges with transportation of mountain weight by motor transport. The project on deposit working out is made Open Company  «Karaganda of Hypromines and To ». Till the end of 2010 it is planned to reach extraction volumes in 1,0 million tons of coal, 2011 to leave on designed capacity of 1,5 million tons of coal of year. To in parallel mountain works additional investigation of two reserve areas representing high potential for increase of resource base is spent. Now the company realizes high-quality coal of marks 2B, 2BC, 3B, 3BC. The prices for production for today make 2600 tenge shipment at own expense, and 3600 tenge from the car. The flexible system of discounts, depending on volume is provided. Joint Stock Company â€Å"SAT Company† aims to join the top 30 largest metallurgical holdings of the CIS in terms of market capitalization. SAT Company JSC solves the following tasks to achieve this aim: †¢ Concentrating the Group’s activities in the most promising sectors: metallurgy and mining sector; †¢ Launching new plants and reaching production capacity; †¢ Supporting liquidity of The Group’s assets and increasing capitalization by approaching foreign capital markets and selling minority share interest. Main activity is wholesale of oil products, petrochemistry, metal processing, air transportation and investments in the fastest developing sectors: construction, oil trading, oil and gas engineering, metallurgy, petrochemistry and transport. Du Pont analysis Table 1. Du Pont analysis | JSC Shubarkol komir| JSC SatCompany| Du pont| 2010| 2009| 2008| Average| 2010| 2009| 2008| Average| Net profitmargin| 30%| 25%| 33. 9%| 29. 6%| 60%| 0. 89%| 43. 6%| 34. 8%| Total Assetturnover| 0. 67| 0. 79| 1. 38| 0. 94| 0. 033| 0. 128| 0. 39| 0. 183667| EquityMultiplier| 2. 47| 2. 2| 2. 5| 2. 39| 2. 11| 1. 7| 1. 48| 1. 63333| ROE| 49. 66%| 43. 86%| 117%| 70. 17%| 4. 17%| 0. 195%| 25. 23%| 9. 86%| Figure 1. Return on equity Return on equity measures the rate of return on the ownership interest of the common stock owners. It measures a firm’s efficiency at generating profits from every unit of shareholders’ equity. ROE shows how well a company uses investment funds to generate earnings gr owth. On figure 1,is shown the rapid decline of return on equity from 2008 to 2009, and from 2009 to 2010 ROE was increased only for 5. 8% approximately. We can assume that world financial crises affected to Kazakhstan at the end of 2008. All manufacturing companies were suffered due to financial crisis. If we compare Subarkol and Sat companies, Sat company is more capable for generating cash internally. One of the reason could be total asset turnover. If we look to other factors, so we can see that total asset turnover of both companies are declining each year. Table 2. Working Capital | JSC Shubarkol komir| JSC SatCompany| Working Capital| 2010| 2009| 2008| Average| 2010| 2009| 2008| Average| Current Assets/Total Assets| 0. 14| 0. 17| 0. 16| 0. 15| 0. 11| 0. 27| 0. 28| 0. 22| CurrentAssets/Sales| 0. 21| 0. 22| 0. 12| 0. 18| 3. 22| 2. 11| 0. 73| 2. 2| Figure 2. Current Asset/total asset Aggressive Investment Policy results in minimal level of investment in current assets versus fixed assets. In contrast, a conservative investment policy places a greater proportion of capital in liquid assets with the opportunity cost of lesser profitability. In order to measure the degree of aggressiveness, following ratio will be us ed: AIP = Total Current Assets/ Total Assets. Where average ratio of Shubarkol is lower than Sat Company. Thus, Shubarkol Company has a relatively aggressive policy, which leads to higher risk and higher return in comparison with Sat Company. Table 3. Liquidity analysis | JSC Shubarkol komir| JSC SatCompany| Liquidity analysis| 2010| 2009| 2008| Average| 2010| 2009| 2008| Average| Current Ratio| 0. 73| 0. 59| 0. 40| 0. 57| 0. 59| 2. 71| 2. 74| 2. 01| Acid-test Ratio| 0. 48| 0. 41| 0. 28| 0,39| 0. 46| 2. 46| 2. 5| 1,80| Figure 3. Current ratio Figure 4. Acid-test ratio Another strong aspect of the company’s operation is its liquidity. From average liquidity ratios of both companies, Sat show better result than Shubarkol, it can cover its debt even if we exclude inventory. In order to cover its current liabilities Shubarkol Company should sell out its inventory. Table 4. Debt analysis | JSC Shubarkol komir| JSC SatCompany| Debt analysis| 2010| 2009| 2008| Average| 2010| 2009| 2008| Average| Leverage ratio| 2. 47| 2. 21| 2. 54| 2. 40| 2. 11| 1. 7| 1. 48| 1. 76| Total Debt ratio| 0. 59| 0. 55| 0. 61| 0. 58| 0. 52| 1. 41| 0. 33| 0. 75| Debt-equity ratio| 1. 47| 1. 21| 1. 54| 1. 40| 1. 11| 0. 70| 0. 48| 0. 76| Interest coverage ratio| 25. 46| 13. 43| 31,1| 23. 33| 2. 34| 5. 83| 2. 17| 3. 45| Figure 5. Debt analysis Shubarkol komir has higher leverage ratio that Sat Company, which means it has possible difficulty in paying interest and principal while obtaining more funding. Leverage ratio=Total assets/Shareholders’ equity. The debt ratio gives an indication of companies total liabilities in relation to their total assets. The higher the ratio, the more leverage the company is using and the more risk it is assuming. Both total assets and liabilities can be found on the balance sheet. The debt ratio of both companies show low level. [Debt R atio = Total debts/Total Assets] The debt to equity ratio is the most popular leverage ratio and it provides detail around the amount of leverage (liabilities assumed) that a company has in relation to the monies provided by shareholders. As you can see through the formula below, the lower the number, the less leverage that a company is using. Again, like the debt ratio, we must understand the drawbacks of this formula. Totalliabilities include operational liabilities that are required to run the business. These are not long term in nature and can distort the debt to equity ratio. Some will exclude accounts payable from the liabilities and/or intangible assets from the shareholder equity component. Debt to equity ratio = Total debts/total equity] The interest coverage ratio tells us how easily a company is able to pay interest expenses associated to the debt they currently have. The ratio is designed to understand the amount of interest due as a function of companies earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT). The interest coverage ratio is very closely monitored because it is viewed as the last line of defense in a sense. A company can get by even when it is in a serious financial bind if it can pay its interest oblig ations. [Interest Coverage ratio = EBIT/Interest Expense] Table 5. Profitability analysis | JSC Shubarkol komir| JSC SatCompany| Profitabilityanalysis| 2010| 2009| 2008| Average| 2010| 2009| 2008| Average| SalesGrowth rate| 14. 7| -9. 79| 66. 69| 23,86| -44| -54| -24. 4| -40. 8| GrossMargin/Sales| 0. 6| 0. 65| 0. 64| 0,63| 0. 04| 0. 22| 0. 41| 0. 22| EBIT/Sales| 0. 55| 0. 48| 0. 62| 0,55| 1. 29| 0. 21| 0. 33| 0. 61| Return onInvestment| 0. 30| 0. 25| 0. 34| 0,29| 0. 93| 0. 009| 0. 44| 0. 46| Return onAssets| 0. 2| 0. 19| 0. 47| 0,28| 0. 03| 0. 001| 0. 17| 0. 067| Figure 6. Sales growth rate Sat Company’s sales growth rate shows bad results, it has negative rates. Figure 7. Profitability analysis The gross profit margin looks at cost of goods sold as a percentage of sales. This ratio looks at how well a company controls the cost of its inventory and the manufacturing of its products and subsequently pass on the costs to its customers. The larger the gross profit margin, the better for the company. The calculation is: Gross Profit/Net Sales. Operating profit is also known as EBIT and is found on the company’s income statement. EBIT is earnings before interest and taxes. The operating profit margin looks at EBIT as a percentage of sales. The operating profit margin ratio is a measure of overall operating efficiency, incorporating all of the expenses of ordinary, daily business activity. The calculation is: EBIT/Net Sales. In average Return on investment has low ratio, even if Sat companies’ ratio is higher than Shubarkol company. The Return on Assets ratio is an important profitability ratio because it measures the efficiency with which the company is managing its investment in assets and using them to generate profit. It measures the amount of profit earned relative to the firm’s level of investment in total assets. The return on assets ratio is related to the asset management category of financial ratios. The calculation for the return on assets ratio is: Net Income/Total Assets. Table 6. Efficiency analysis | JSC Shubarkol komir| JSC SatCompany| Efficiencyanalysis| 2010| 2009| 2008| Average| 2010| 2009| 2008| Average| InventoryTurnover| 5. 57| 6. 4| 9. 56| 7. 17| 1. 6| 4. 69| 7. 78| 4. 69| Total AssetsTurnover| 0. 68| 0. 79| 2. 38| 1. 28| 0. 03| 0. 13| 0. 39| 0. 18| AverageCollectionperiod| 1. 68| 7. 29| 1. 2| 3. 39| 3. 26| 2. 91| 0. 65| 2. 27| AccountsPayableturnover| 9. 6| 17. 48| 2. 17| 9. 75| 0. 9| 2. 85| 3. 13| 2. 22| Figure 8. Efficiency analysis Efficiency ratios are ratios that come off the the Balance Sheet and the Income Statement and therefore incorporate one dynamic statement, the income statement and one static statement, the balance sheet. These ratios are important in measuring the efficiency of a company in either turning their inventory, sales, assets, accounts receivables or payables. It also ties into the ability of a company to meet both its short term and long term obligations. This ratio is obtained by dividing the ‘Total Sales’ of a company by its ‘Total Inventory’. The ratio is regarded as a test of Efficiency and indicates the rapidity with which the company is able to move its merchandise. Shubarkol Company is able to rotate its inventory in sales in average 7. 17 times in one fiscal year. When Sat company only 4. 69 times. The total asset turnover represents the amount of revenue generated by a company as a result of its assets on hand. Formula: [Total Asset Turnover = Sales/Total Assets]. Total asset turnover of shubarkol company is higher, thus it has the lower the profit margins, since the company is able to sell more products at a cheaper rate. The Average collection period ratio shows both the average time it takes to turn the receivables into cash and the age, in terms of days, of a company’s accounts receivable. The ratio is regarded as a test of Efficiency for a company. The effectiveness with which it converts its receivables into cash. This ratio is of particular importance to credit and collection associates. To convert its accounts receivables into cash for Shubarkol Company takes in average 3. 39 days and for Sat company 2. 27 days. The Accounts Payable turnover shows investors how many times per period the company pays its average payable amount. Thus, Shubarkol’s accounts payable turned over 9. 75 times and Sat’s 2. 22 in average during the past year. Shubarkol Company is paying its suppliers very quickly, it may mean that the suppliers are demanding very fast payment terms. Sat Company is paying its suppliers more slowly, and may be an indicator of worsening financial condition. Capital Structure Policy Table 7. Capital Structure JSC Shubarkol komir| #shares| B| EBIT| I| EBT| EAT| Ki| EPS| P| Ke=EPS/P| S=#shares x P| V=S+B| 4,500| 200| 11,236| 24| 11,212| 10,098| 10. 8| 3. 6| 1,250| 0. 9| 5,314,500| 5,314,700| 3,500| 300| 11,236| 39| 11,197| 10,077| 11. 7| 4. 6| 1,181| 0. 39| 4,375,000| 4,375,300| 2,500| 400| 11,236| 56| 11,180| 10,062| 12. 6| 6. 5| 1,140| 0. 57| 2,850,000| 2,850,400| JSC SatCompany| #shares| B| EBIT| I| EBT| EAT| Ki| EPS| P| Ke=EPS/P| S=#shares x P| V=S+B| 3,000| 1,000| 3,678| 130| 3,548| 3,448| 11. 7| 0. 91| 1,100| 0,08| 3,300,000| 3,301,000| 2,000| 1,300| 3,678| 182| 3,496| 3,366| 12. 6| 1. 37| 1,150| 0. 12| 2,300,000| 2,301,300| 1,000| 1,600| 3,678| 240| 3,438| 3,278| 13. 5| 2. 73| 1,200| 0. 2| 1,200,000| 1,201,600| Table 8. Capitalization rate JSC Subarkol komir| Ki(B/V ) + Ke(S/V) =Ko| 0. 0004| 0. 29| 0. 29| 0. 0008| 0. 39| 0. 39| 0. 0018| 0. 57| 0. 57| JSC SatCompany| Ki(B/V ) + Ke(S/V) =Ko| 0. 0035| 0,08| 0. 0835| 0. 0071| 0. 12| 0. 1271| 0. 0180| 0. 22| 0. 2380| For Shubarkol Company the optimal level of debt is 400 000 tenge, because the lowest Ko= 0. 29 and highest price is 1250 tg/share. For SatCompany the optimal level is 100 000 tenge, where Ko=0. 0835. Dividend Policy Provision on dividend policy of JSC Shubarkol Komir 1. General provisions The present Provision on dividend policy of JSC Shubarkol Komir is developed according to the legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan, the Charter, the Code of corporate governance of JSC Shubarkol komir and other internal documents. The purpose of the present Situation is ensuring balance of interests of Society and Shareholders and a transparent approach at determination of the amount of dividend payments of Society for shareholders. The policy of Society is based on respect and strict observance of the rights of the Shareholders provided by the legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan, the Charter of Society and its internal documents. The dividend policy of Society is directed on increase of welfare of Shareholders, increase of investment appeal of Society and its capitalization. 2. Main conditions of payment of dividends to Shareholders 2. 1. Society, proceeding from the size of the received net profit (total profit) in a year and requirements of development of production and investment activity, aspires to increase the size of dividends paid to Shareholders along with growth of capitalization. 2. 2. Conditions of payment of dividends to Shareholders of Society are: 1. xistence at Society of a net profit (total profit) in a year defined according to point 3. 1. Provisions 2. absence of restrictions on payment of the dividends provided by point 5 of article 22 of the Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan  «About joint-stock companies »; 3. decision of General meeting of shareholders of Society. 3. Order of determination of the amount of charge of dividends 3. 1. The size of the dividends charged by Society, is def ined with the standard. The net profit (total profit) Societies is defined on the basis of its consolidated financial statements made according to IFRS. . 2. According to the current legislation and the Society Charter the Board of directors of Society prepares offers on an order of distribution of a net profit of Society for expired fiscal year and the size of the dividend in a year counting on one common share of Society 3. 3. The Society board of directors by preparation of the offer on an order of distribution of a net profit of Society for expired fiscal year and the size of dividends in a year, recognizes that the sum directed on payment of dividends, should make not less than 17,5 % of a net profit. 3. 4. The question of possibility of payment by Society of dividends on common and preference shares quarterly, time in half a year, or following the results of a year is regulated according to the current legislation. The question is considered by Society Board, proceeding from the received financial results and look-ahead indicators of the size of dividends of Society actions. 3. 5. The Society board of directors, on the basis of offers of Board of Society, considers the main directions of distribution of a net profit (total profit), and also forms offers on a share of a net profit (total profit), directed on dividend payments. . 6. The Societies of the offer created by Board of directors about an order of distribution of a net profit of Society for expired fiscal year and the size of the dividend in a year counting on one common share of Society are submitted for consideration of General shareholder meeting. 3. 7. The final decision about the size of dividends is established by the deci sion of General meeting of shareholders of Society. 4. Order of payment of dividends 4. 1. Dividends are paid to Shareholders in the terms established by the Charter of Society and the relevant decision of General shareholder meeting. 4. 2. Society provides timely and complete payment of dividends to Shareholders. 4. 3. Payment of dividends considered transfer of the corresponding sums of money from the Society account on bank accounts of Shareholders according to the decision accepted at General shareholder meeting on terms and an order of payment of dividends. 4. 4. Payment of dividends is made by money or Society securities. Society has the right to make payment of dividends on stocks Society securities provided that such payment is carried out by the declared actions and the bonds issued by Society, in the presence of the written consent of Shareholders. Payment of dividends by securities on preference shares of Society isn’t allowed. 4. 5. The taxation of paid dividends is carried out in an order provided by the legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan. 5. Informing of Shareholders on dividend policy of Society 5. 1. Society places the present Situation, changes and/or additions to it on the corporate website of Society. 5. 2. Within 10 working days from the date of making decision of General shareholder meeting on payment of dividends on common shares of the Society Society publishes this decision in mass media. Thus Society also publishes this decision on the corporate website. . 3. The decision on payment of dividends on common shares of Society should contain the following data: 1. name, location, bank and other details of Society; 2. the period for which dividends are paid; 3. the size of the dividend counting on one common share; 4. start date of payment of dividends; 5. an order and a form of payment of dividends with the indication of the sizes, terms, ways and a form of payment of dividends. 5. 4. The materials provided to Shareholders for decision-making, should contain all necessary information on existence/lack of the conditions necessary for payment of dividends. . Responsibility for incomplete or untimely payment of dividends to Shareholders 6. 1. Responsibility for appropriate and timely execution of decisions of General shareholder meeting about payment of dividends, including complete payment of dividends, bears Society Board. sizes, terms, ways and form of payment of dividends. Dividend Policy Ratios Dividend policy ratios provide insight into the dividend policy of the firm and the prospects for future growth. Two commonly used ratios are the dividend yield and payout ratio. Table 9. Dividend policy ratios | JSC Shubarkol komir| JSC Sat;Company| 2010| 2009| 2008| Average| 2010| 2009| 2008| Average| Dividend yield| 10. 47| 6. 5| 8. 4| 8. 45| 11. 2| 10. 11| 9. 7| 10. 33| Payout ratio| 25. 4| 19. 7| 23. 25| 22. 78| 31. 56| 30. 7| 20. 9| 27. 72| A high dividend yield does not necessarily translate into a high future rate of return. It is important to consider the prospects for continuing and increasing the diviend in the future. The dividend payout ratio is helpful in this regard. Figure 9. Dividend policy ratios Break-even analysis We assume variable costs consist of 70 of total cost, and rest 30 is fixed costs Table 10. Break-even | JSC Shubarkol komir| JSC Sat;Company| | 2010| 2009| 2008| Average| 2010| 2009| 2008| Average| Break-even| 14| 15. 3| 16. 7| 15. 3| 229| 52| 81| 120. 7| DOL| 1| 1| 1| 1| -1. 69| 1. 21| 1. 12| 0. 21| DFL| 1| 1| 1| 1| 1. 99| 1. 70| 1. 24| 1. 64| TL| 1| 1| 1| 1| -3. 36| 2. 05| 1. 38| 0. 07| Figure 10. Leverage analysis Operating leverage is a measure of how sensitive net operating income is to percentage changes in sales. Shubarkol’ net operating income grows 1 times as fast as its sales, whereas Sat’s net operating income declines for 1. 69 as its sales. Degree of Financial Leverage is very helpful in comparing various firms and the riskiness of their capital structures in a particular industry. The Sat company has high degree of financial leverage than Shubarkol, thus Sat company more riskier, consequently it has higher return. The Shubarkol company will meet break-even point at the level of 16,7 tons in average. The Sat;Company at 229 tons. P/E ratio analysis Table 11. P/E ratio | JSC Shubarkol komir| JSC Sat;Company| P/E| 2010| 2009| 2008| Average| 2010| 2009| 2008| Average| Price per share/EPS| 1,377| 1,936| 840| 1,384| 512. 9| 7,241| 286. | 2,680| Figure 11. Price per share/EPS PE ratio show the â€Å"embedded value† in stocks and are used by the investors as a screening device before making their investment. For example, a high P/E ratio may be regarded by some as being a sign of â€Å"over pricing†. When the markets are bullish or if the investor sentiment is optimistic about a particular stock, the P/E ratio wil l tend to be high indicating that investors are willing to pay a high price for company’s earnings. Sat company has higher P/E ratio than Shubarkol company. It mean the more the market is willing to pay for this company’s earnings. Vertical and Trend analysis Table 12. Vertical analysis (Income statement) | JSC Shubarkol komir| JSC Sat;Company| | 2010| 2009| 2008| Average| 2010| 2009| 2008| Average| Revenue| 100| 100| 100| 100| 100| 100| 100| 100| Cost ofGoods Sold| 39| 35| 36| 36| 95| 77| 58| 76| Gross profit| 61| 65| 64| 63| 5| 23| 42| 23| Financingincome| 0. 31| 0. 21| 0. 17| 0. 23| 0. 84| 18| 3. 2| 7. 3| Otherincome| 4. 5| 1. 5| 0. 7| 2. 06| 759| 162| 65| 328| Sellingexpenses| (0. 08)| (0. 07)| (0. 07)| (0. 07)| 11. 8| 17| 8. 2| 12. 3| General andadministrative expenses| (4. 5)| (5)| (3. 37)| (4. 9)| (446)| (24)| (200)| 223| EarningsbeforeInterestand Taxes| 61. 23| 61| 61. 4| 61| 330| 160| 81| 190| Interestexpense| (3. 22)| (4. 8)| (0. 7)| 2. 9| (68)| 22| 13| 34| Otherexpenses| (1)| (3. 5)| (0. 2)| 1. 56| 237| 150| 67| 151| Earningsbeforetaxes| 57| 52. 7| 60. 5| 56| 0. 36| 0. 15| 2. 7| 1. 07| Incometaxes| (11)| (11)| (16)| (12. 6)| 12. 66| 2. 88| 0| 5. 18| Tax onsuperprofit| (12. 5)| (17)| (16)| (15)| 224. 5| 150| 65| 146| Net Income| 33. 51| 24. 7| 28. 5| 20. 23| 224. 5| 150| 65| 146| Table 13. Trend analysis (Income statement) | JSC Shubarkol komir| JSC Sat;Company| 2010| 2009| 2008| Average| 2010| 2009| 2008| Average| Revenue| 17. 2| -9. 3| 200| 69| -44| -60| -3| -36| Cost ofGoods Sold| 30| -10| 49| 23| -33| -40| -22| -31| Gross profit| 10| -9| 507| 169| -89| -75| 53| -72| Financingincome| 74| 13| -16| 23| -97| 166| 0| 23| Other income| 263| 89| -15| 112| 165| 16| 50| 77| Sellingexpenses| 15| -8| 33| 13| -62| -2| -21| -28| General andadministrative expenses| 4| -36| -12| 14| 923| -50| 11| 295| EarningsbeforeInterestand Taxes| 10| -10| 803| 267| 6. 3| -12| 59| 18| Interestexpense| -22| -547| -35| 201| 69| -23| -13| 11| Otherexpenses| -66| -1868| 21| -638| -4| -5. | 46| 12| Earningsbeforetaxes| 19| -21| 10000| 3333| -56| -97| 48. 4| -34| Incometaxes| 17| -39| 861| 280| -145| 0| 0| -48| Tax onsuperprofit| -16| 53| – 12. 3| (15)| -7. 26| -| -| -| Net Income| 45| -34| 858| 20. 23 | 289| -4| 168| 52| Table 14. Vertical analysis (Balance sheet) | JSC Shubarkol komir| JSC Sat;Company| ASSETS| 2010 %| 2009 %| 2008 %| Average %| 2010 %| 2009 %| 2008 %| Average %| Current Assets:| | | | | | | | | Cash and Cash Equivalents| 2. 4| 1. 8| 2. 5| 2. 2| 3. 47| 3. 63| 13. 81| 6. 97| FinancialReceivables| 0. 01| 0| 0| 0. 003| 2,94| 11. 23| 7. 03| 7| Inventories| 5| 5| 5. 8| 5. 06| 2. 41| 2. 86| 2. 47| 2. 58| Current portionof Long termassets held tosale| | | | | 1,21| 1. 82| 0| 1. 01| Advances paid and other receivables| 0. 36| 1. 6| 0. 46| 0. 80| -| -| -| -| Value added tax and other tax receivables| 4| 1| 0. 63| 1. 87| -| -| -| -| Other currentassets| 6| 7| 8. 08| 7. 03| 0,61| 0. 49| 0. 99| 0. 69| Total currentassets| 14| 17| 16. 86| 15. 95| 10. 65| 20. 05| 28. 67| 16. 79| Long-termassets:| | | | | | | | | Investmentsaccounted for using equity method| 25. 9| 0. 01| 0. 0076| 8. 34| 1. 40| 10. 74| 0. 0008| 4. 05| Property, plant and equipment| 45. 47| 61| 56. 9| 54. 49| 56 . 9| 12. 11| 14. 45| 27. 82| Intangible assets| 11. 5| 18| 22. 45| 17. 32| 5,38| 0. 33| 0. 05| 1. 92| Investment inassociatedcompanies| | | | | 4. 91| 0. 99| 0| 1. 96| Deffered taxes| | | | | 0. 58| 0. 23| 0. 34| 0. 38| Other long-termassets| 3. 14| 2. 77| 3. 67| 3. 19| 7. 79| 14. 79| 47. 85| 23. 48| Total long-term assets| 86| 83| 83. 14| 84| 89. 34| 79. 94| 71. 32| 80. 2| TOTALASSETS| 100| 100| 100| 100| 100| 100| 100| 100| | | | | | | | | | SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITYANDLIABILITIES| | | | | | | | | Currentliabilities:| | | | | | | | | FinancialPayables| 5. 24| 8. 9| 24| 12. 71| 5. 3| 12. 55| 1. 14| 6. 50| Taxes payable| 9| 14| 9. 4| 10. 8| 0. 07| 0. 04| 0. 17| 0. 09| Advancesreceived andother payables| 0. 38| 0. 56| 0. 2| 0. 38| -| -| -| -| Accountspayable| 1. 46| 1. 71| 2. 6| 1. 92| -| -| -| -| Evaluationliabilities| 1. 53| 1. 71| 1. 9| 1. 71| -| -| -| -| Short term loans| -| -| -| -| 12,16| 2,37| 2,51| 5. 68| Other currentliabilities| 1. 43| 1. 36| 2. 73| 1. 84| -| -| -| -| Tot al currentliabilities| 19| 28. 8| 42| 29. 93| 18. 07| 14. 96| 10. 45| 14. 49| Long-termliabilities:| | | | | | | | | Long-termfinancialpayables| 25. 8| 3| 0. 4| 9. 73| 19. 689| 26. 35| 21. 0| 22. 44| Reserves torestore locations| -| -| -| -| 1. 61| 0. 51| 0| 1. 04| Long-termevaluationliabilities| 8. 71| 16. 73| 11| 12. 15| 1,61| -| -| -| Deferred taxliabilities| 6| 6. 3| 7. 5| 6. 06| 12. 86| 7. 80| 0. 85| 7. 17| Other Long termliabilities| | | | | 0. 25| 0. 01| 0| 0. 08| Total long term liabilities| 40. 5| 26. 11| 18. 7| 28. 44| 34. 42| 34. 68| 22. 15| 30. 41| Shareholders’equity:| | | | | | | | | Issued capital| 33. 4| 46. 2| 27| 35. 53| 22. 29| 21. 48| 7. 32| 17. 03| Additional paidincapital| 0. 9| 0. 9| 1. 4| 1. 06| -| -| -| -| Treasury Stocks| -| -| -| -| -0,03| ? ,01| 0| -0. 013| Retainedearnings| 6. 4| -2| 11| 5. 13| 18,65| 28,08| 47,17| 31. 3| Totalshareholders’ equity| 40. 5| 45| 39. 3| 41. 6| 47,50| 50,35| 54,50| 50. 78| TOTALSHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY ANDLIA BILITIES| 100| 100| 100| 100| 100| 100| 100| 100| Table 15. Trend analysis (balance sheet) | JSC Shubarkol komir| JSC Sat;Company| ASSETS| 2010 %| 2009 %| 2008 %| Average %| 2010 %| 2009 %| 2008 %| Average %| Current Assets:| | | | | | | | | Cash and Cash Equivalents| 85| 13. 11| -9. 14| 29. 65| 79,91| ? 57,43| 1077,4| 366. 49| FinancialReceivables| 0| 0| 0| 0| ? 50,60| 158,61| ? 5,86| 1072| Current portionof Long termassets held tosale| -| -| -| -| 25,02| 0| ? 100| -37. 4| Advances paid and other receivables| -68| 447| -71| 102. 6| -| -| -| -| Inventories| 21| 64. 56| 95| 60. 19| 58. 35| 87. 52| ? 28. 45| 39. 14| Value added tax and other tax receivables| 46| 159| 62| 89| -| -| -| -| Other currentassets| 15| 40. 72| 53| 36. 24| 131. 77| ? 19. 71| ? 58. 61| 17. 82| Total currentassets| 13| 59. 35| 33| 35| ? 0. 01| 13. 20| ? 25. 61| -4. 47| Long-termassets:| | | | | | | | | Investmentsaccounted forusing equitymethod| 3698| 50| 0| 1249| ? 75. 42| 1961| ? 7. 36| 616| Property, plant an d equipment| 1. 56| 70. 97| 11. 13| 27. 88| 784. 05| 35. 64| ? 19. 59| 266. 68| Investment inassociatedcompanies| -| -| -| -| 826. 77| 1820. 8| ? 99. 93| 848. 94| Intangible assets| – 12| 27. 24| 906| 307. 08| 2968| 894,10| ? 18,76| 1281| Other long-term assets| 57| 18. 67| 43| 39. 55| 0,85602| 49,9572| 0| 16. 93| Total long-term assets| 44| 56. 84| 29. 2| 43. 34| 110. 3| 4 81. 37| 136. 27| 442| TOTAL ASSETS| 38| 57| 30| 41. 66| 88. 21| 61. 82| 45. 42| 65. 15| SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY AND LIABILITIES| | | | | | | | | Currentliabilities:| | | | | | | | | FinancialPayables| -19| -40. 5| 116| 19| ? 12. 43| 1683| ? 92. 22| 526| Taxes payable| -14| 140| -| 42| 243,07| ? 61,85| 9,48| 63. 66| Short term loans| -| -| -| -| 864. 69| 52. 75| ? 69. 78| 282. 55| Advancesreceived andother payables| -6| 350| -| 114| -| -| -| -| Accountspayable| 18| -33| 45| 10| -| -| -| -| Evaluationliabilities| 23| 43| 313| 126. 3| -| -| -| -| Other currentliabilities| 45| -22| 55| 26. 33| -| -| -| -| Total currentliabilities| -8| 7. 8| 164| 54. 6| 127| 131| ? 59| 66| Long-termliabilities:| | | | | | | | | Long-termfinancialpayables| 1063| 1096| 8| 722. 3| 40. 59277| 100. 2517| 435. 4730| 192. 106| Long-termevaluationliabilities| -28| 143| 60| 58. 33| -| -| -| -| Reserves torestore locations| -| -| -| -| 488. 52| 0| 0| 162. 84| Deferred taxliabilities| 30| 32| 89| 50. 33| 210. 11| 1369| 800| 793| Total long term liabilities| 114| 119| 68| 433. 66| 86,78| 153,28| 444,02| 227. 66| Shareholders’equity:| | | | | | | | | Issued capital| 0. 1| 170| 1| 57| 94. 6 9| 374. 61| 0| 156| Additional paidin capital| 0| 0| 84| 28| -| -| -| -| Treasury stocks| ? | ? | ? | ? | 6110| 0| 0| 2036. 9| Retainedearnings| 550| -128| -49| 124| 25| ? | 57| 26| Exchange ratedifference| ? | ? | ? | ? | ? 245| 0| 0| -81. 7| Totalshareholders’ equity| 24| 80| -22| 27| 77. 570| 49. 49| 46| 57. 68| TOTALSHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITYANDLIABILITIES| 38| 57| 20| 38| 88. 21| 85. 74| 30,. 20| 68. 05| The company generates its revenue from sale of coal. Revenue was increased from 2009 to 2010 for 17. As we told before the crisis affected to rapid decline in revenue from 2008 to 2009, due to cyclical type of industry. Cost of goods sold and net income show stable results during past three years. Level of cash is low in terms current liability. The company is less liquid. Property, plant and equipment take more than half of the total assets. We can assume it is because of type of the company, due to it is manufacturing company in needs more equipment. In comparison with 2008 past two years 2009 and 2010 the company financed with debt. Shareholders’ Equity section relatively good results it is increasing each year. Average of Cash and Cash equivalents in JSC Shubarkol komir is 2. 2 % and Sat ; Company`s average cash is 6. 97%. Basically company`s cash and cash equivalents should be at minimum instead of saving they should invest it to generate future cash flows. In our case cash both companies have minimum cash. Accounts Receivable in Company Shubarkol is 0. 003% and Sat Company is 7%. It says that both companies sells their product on cash, not on credit. But in order to sell more they should change their policy, selling not only on cash basis also on credit. Average inventory in Company Shubarkol is 5. 06% and in company Sat it is 2. 58%, it is a good sign both companies runs efficient business, inventory level at the minimum. In order not to have remaining inventories companies should use JIT. Property, plant and equipment take more than half of the total assets in both companies We can assume it is because of type of the company, due to it is manufacturing company in needs more equipment. Accounts Payable in Company Shubarkol decreased from 2. 6% to 1. 46 during 2008-2010. Company Sat doesn’t have any accounts payables. Company Shubarkol and Sat generates its revenue from sale of coal. Cost of goods sold in Company Shubarkol is 36% of revenue and in company Sat is 76 % of revenue. Average EBIT in Company Shubarkol is 61%, in Sat Company it is 190%, it is much higher because of Other income, it is 19mln when revenue is 2mln. In Company Shubarkol net income show stable results during past three years. But In Sat Company it is increased from 65% to 224% , average is 146%. III. Summary and recommendations Table 16. Comparison table | Shubarkol Komir| Sat;Company| ROE| High| Low| CA/TA| Low| High| CA/Sales| Low| High| Current ratio| Low| High| Acid test ratio| Low| High| Total debt| Low| High| Debt to equity| High| Low| Gross mar/Sales| High| Low| EBIT/Sales| Low| High| ROI| Low| High| Inventory turnover| High| Low| Total Asset Turnover| High| Low| Average collection period| High| Low| Accounts payable turnover| High| Low| ROA| High| Low| P/E ratio| Low| High| Recommendations 1. Overhead: Assess overhead costs and if there are opportunities to decrease them. lowering overhead has a direct impact on profitability. Overhead expenses, including rent, advertising, indirect labor and professional fees, are indirect expenses that you incur to operate the business outside of direct material and direct labor. 2. Accounts receivable: Monitor accounts receivables effectively to ensure that the company billing their clients properly and that you’re receiving pro mpt payments. . Accounts payable: Negotiate longer payment terms with vendors whenever possible to keep money longer. 4. Profitability: Review the profitability on your various products and services. Assess where prices can be increased on a regular basis to maintain or increase profitability. As costs increase and markets change, prices may need to be adjusted as well. 5. Current ratio: Increase current assets by increasing profit, selling additional capital stock, borrowing additional long term debt, or disposing of unproductive fixed assets and retaining proceeds. Reduce current liabilities by retaining a greater portion of allocated savings. Avoid financing non-current assets with current liabilities. References 1. James C. Van Horne â€Å"Fundamentals of Financial Management 13th edition†, 2008 2. http://www. sat. kz/ru/about/cel Retrieved from: 20. 04. 12 3. http://www. kase. kz/ru/emitters/show/SHUK Retrieved from: 15. 04. 12 4. Penman, Stephen H. â€Å"Financial Statement Analysis and Securities Valuation, 4th ed†. , McGraw Hill; International Edition, 2010. Appendix A JSC â€Å"ShubarkolKomir† Balance Sheet As at December 31, 2010 ASSETS| 2010| 2009| Current Assets:| | | Cash and Cash Equivalents| 685 621| 371 204| Financial Receivables| 4 115| 0| Advances paid and other receivables| 102 791| 328 837| Inventories| 1 356 411| 1 119 355| Value added tax and other tax receivables| 114 344| 215 766| Other current assets| 1 724 049| 1 492 957| Total current assets| 3 996 331| 3 528 119| Long-term assets:| | | Investments accounted for using equity method| 7 399 383| 2 000| Property, plant and equipment| 12 993 624| 12 794 808| Intangible assets| 3 285 530| 3 751 702| Other long-term assets| 897 362| 572 860| Total long-term assets| 24 575 899| 17 121 371| TOTAL ASSETS| 28 572 230| 20 649 490| SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY AND LIABILITIES| | | Current liabilities:| | | Financial Payables| 1 496 280| 1 851 452| Taxes payable| 2 571 754| 2 983 414| Advances received and other payables| 110 972| 117 516| Accounts payable| 418 977| 354 986| Evaluation liabilities| 438 035| 355 173| Other current liabilities| 408 340| 281 281| Total current liabilities| 5 444 358| 5 943 822| Long-term liabilities:| | | Long-term financial payables| 7 376 747| 634 493| Long-term evaluation liabilities| 2 488 523| 3 456 287| Deferred tax liabilities| 1 698 759| 1 302 972| Total long term liabilities| 11 564 029| 5 393 752| Shareholders’ equity:| | | Issued capital| 9 540 291| 9 531 291| Additional paid-in capital| 188 566| 188 566| Retained earnings| 1 834 986| -407 941| Total shareholders’ equity| 11 563 843| 9 311 916| TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY AND LIABILITIES| 28 572 230| 20 649 490| | | | Balance value (common stock), tenge| 2 316| 1 543| Balance value (preferred stock), tenge| 2 238| 2 289| Appendix B Income Statement For the year ended December 31, 2010 ASSETS| 2010| 2009| Revenue| 19 382 881| 16 533 291| Cost of Goods Sold| (7 612 683)| (5 834 093)| Gross profit| 11 770 198| 10 699 198| Financing income| 61 448| 35 051| Other income| 291 879| 242 452| Selling expenses| (15 556)| (13 577)| General and administrativeexpenses| (871 190)| (836 592)| Earnings before Interest andTaxes| 11 175 331| 10 126 532| Interest expense| (624 944)| (797 304)| Other expenses| (193 703)| (571 122)| Earnings before taxes| 10 418 133| 8 758 106| Income taxes| (2 160 673)| (1 847 672)| Tax on superprofit| (2 420 352)| (2 881 292)| Net Income| 5 837 109| 4 029 142| Appendix C Statement of Cash Flows For the year ended December 31, 2010 Cash Flow from OperatingActivities:| 2010| 2009| Cash inflows:| 29 253 053| 22 716 771| From sales of goods| 28 535 245| 21 495 162| From advance payments| 408 340| 1 121 843| Other proceeds| 309 468| 99 766| Cash Outflows:| 21 348 705| 16 363 748| To pay suppliers for goods and services| 7 857 546| 6 846 546| To pay out advances| 3 598 673| 1 369 020| To pay employees salary| 463 958| 354 121| Interest paid| 304 179| 489 121| Income tax paid| 1 772 233| 1 853 11| To pay tax on superprofit| 2 725 639| 2 091 833| Other payments to budget| 1 904 193| 1 257 436| Other payments| 2 722 284| 2 102 419| Net cash provided by operating activities| 7 904 349| 6 353 023| Cash Flow from Investing Activities:| | | Cash inflows:| 431 000| 1 643| From sale of fixed assets| | 1 643| Payment for long-term investments| 431 000| | Cash outflow:| 10 747 057| 9 133 255| To acquire fixed assets| 2 931 557| 2 796 255| Purchase of other long-term assets| 7 384 500| 6 000 000| Purchase debt of other entities| 431 000| 337 000| Net cash provided by investing activities| -10 316 057| -9 131 612| Cash Flow from Financing Activities:| | | Cash inflow:| 9 338 999| 7 320 373| From the sale of firm’s own equity securities| 8 999| 6 008 982| From borrowing| 9 080 000| 1 311 391| Other proceeds| 250 000| 0| Cash outflow:| 6 624 635| 4 499 402| To repay amounts borrowed| 3 042 253| 1 449 556| To repurchase the firm’s own equity securities| 0| 9 000| To pay shareholders dividends| 3 582 382| 40 846| Others| | 3 000 000| Net cash provided by financing activities| 2 714 364| 2 820 971| Net increase/(decrease) in cash| 302 656| 42 382| Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of the year| 382 965| 328 822| Cash and cash equivalents, end of the year| 685 621| 371 204| Appendix D JSC â€Å"Sat Company† Balance Sheet As at December 31, 2010 ASSETS| 2010| 2009| Current Assets:| | | Cash and Cash Equivalents| 2,720,160| 1,511,944| Financial Receivables| 2,310,048| 4,676,501| Inventories| 1,888,077| 1,192,271| Current portion of Long term assets held to sale| 949,524| 759,512| Other current assets| 477,206| 205,892| Total current assets| 8,345,022| 8,346,120| Long-term assets:| | | Investments accounted for using equity method| 1,098,757| 4,471,632| Property, plant and equipment| 44,567,701| 5,041,284| Intangible assets| 4,216,968| 137,425| Investment in associated companies| 3,849,628| 415,379| Deffered taxes| 455,677| 96,137| Other long-term assets| 6,105,903| 6,158,622| Total long-term assets| 69,979,554| 33,268,595| TOTAL ASSETS| 78,324,576| 41,614,715| SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY AND LIABILITIES| | | Current liabilities:| | | Financial Payables| 4,573,685| 5,223,219| Taxes payable| 56,727| 16,535| Short term loans| 9,526,727| 987,540| Total current liabilities| 14,157,139| 6,227,294| Long-term liabilities:| | | Long term loans| 15,421,083| 10,968,617| Reserves to restore locations| 1, 263,082| 214,620| How to cite Tern Paper: Compare Two Companies, Essay examples

Fundamentals of Quality Auditing

Question: Discuss about the Fundamentals of Quality Auditing. Answer: Introduction Auditing tends to be a systematic process where auditors objectively obtain and evaluate evidence in regards to the economic assertion acts and the events, so as to ascertain the extent of correspondence between assertion and the established criteria by communicating the pertain results to the interested parties. Based on this, auditors are required to possess the assurance aspect. Assurance tends to be the engagement whereby a practitioner tends to express conclusion designed for the purpose of enhancing confidence to the intended users rather than focusing on the responsible team about the results being evaluated in terms of measurement of the subject against the set criteria (Russel Wilson, 2013). In this case, a good example of assurance services includes assurance (audit) of the pertained financial statements, assurance reporting of internal control, assurance of electronic commerce and assurance of prospective financial information. Consideration of all these leads to the syst ematic phase process where it implies that there is the need of developing a well planned logical approach when conducting an audit as it involves objective obtaining and evaluation evidence. With all these in mind as discussed above, it proves that auditing tends to more conceptual in nature compared to accounting process. In accounting, the main focus is mostly on learning the rules, techniques and computations needed for the purpose of preparing financial statements (Wright, 2016). As for auditing it mostly focuses on learning the framework of analytics and logical skills needed in evaluating the relevant and reliability of a system and process in financial information, as well as the information itself (Fairhall, 2010). Therefore, for one to be successful in the auditing process, he or she must be able to follow certain auditing canons that are vital in the conduction of the process. Therefore, this paper will offer an in-depth insight of the auditing procedure and relate it without case study as an assertion factor. Hence, they include: Identifying the assertion being tested In many instances, audit procedures are done so as to test the financial statements assertions (Prinsloo et al, 2014). Therefore, it tends to be critical that when explaining the audit procedure you first identify the assertion that needs testing. In this case, the assertions embodied in the financial statement are often vital for auditors because they aim at considering different types of potential misstatements as they appear in different forms. Therefore, as an auditor of Best Living Supplies Limited first I should understand that the assertions that need testing include; perpetual inventory file and physical inventory file. To enhance understanding of this step certain considerations must be taken so as to make the process effective, and they include occurrence, completeness, accuracy, valuation and allocation, existence, cut off and classification. Completeness- here, one must consider all the transactions that have been recorded in the financial statements-i.e. the liabilities, assets, equity interest and other disclosure have been effectively included in the financial statement (Homewood, 2001). As for our case study, as the auditor one should ensure that the needed transactional variable in the perpetual inventory file is recorded, this tends to extend also to the physical inventory file. Occurrence- the assertion here must indicate those transactions and the events, as well as other matters, that have been recorded as they took place and tend to relate to the organization. For instance, as the auditor of Best Living Company in the perpetual inventory file, I should ensure that each item purchased or sold during the year is correctly recorded as it happened. It should also be evident that the recorded transaction is in relation to the company. Valuation and allocation- here, the recorded transactions in the financial statements requires appropriate valuation according to companys policy and there be a relevant reporting framework. In any instance of allocation or valuation of any transactional adjustments need there is need of fair disclosure with the appropriate amounts (Parsowith, 1995). In our case, we should consider the factor that in perpetual inventory file all the transactions in relation to purchase and sale are correctly recorded in terms of correct value. If there is any adjustment, they should also be recorded to prevent instances of financial misstatement that are likely to occur. Accuracy- this means that in relation to the transactional and the events that are effectively recorded in terms of accurate amounts-i.e. the amounts that appear in the sources of documents (Kunz Hamel, 2014). If we could make a relation with our case study firm, as an auditor when conducting the audit procedure, I will make sure that the transactions recorded in the perpetual and physical inventory files entry are accurate. Hence, this step tends to prevent an instance where there is indication or appearance of error. Classification- this entails that financial information is appropriately presented and disclosed, and for the disclosure purposes they should be clearly expressed s as to make it easy for users to understand. In our case study, when disclosing information during auditing for Best Living Supplies Company what should be considered is the use of simple language and the state matter must be clear and concisely for the purpose of enhancing understanding. Existence- when conducting this audit procedure one should be able to substantiate if the reporting date of the entity is correct (Basu, 2009). Such a step tends to be paramount in our case as we can know the actual date a transaction took place in relation to the purchasing or sale of assets in the physical or perpetual inventory file. Cutoff- as an auditor it is vital to understand that the transactional and the events that have been recorded in terms of the correct account time. In our case, if goods in our two inventory files goods are delivered before the year end, it means that all these needs to be included in the cost of goods or services being sold not in the inventory. Consideration of such facts tends to be vital in auditing procedure. Identify the audit procedure Here, it becomes vital if one can choose the assertion being tested as indicated above. Hence, one chooses assertion from valuation, allocation, existence and rights. Onwards after choosing the assertion being tested it is vital to identify the risk that may cause any form of materiality misstatements as they appear in financial statements (Saxena et al, 2010). Here, the auditing risk tends to be the total value of Best Living Supplies Company property, plant and equipment as indicated the two inventory files. Hence, the significance of this step tends to be avoidance of revalued assets. The problem that comes about with revalued asset tends to be the not fair representation of values, where they can be under/overstated. Therefore, this procedure is very paramount when conducting auditing in our case company. Lastly, it is vital to at least try and thinks of auditing procedure from the AEIOU. A is a representation of the analytical procedures, the E-enquiry and confirmation, I for inspection of the recorded assets; O entails observation and U being the recalculation and the re-performance. Considering this procedure for Best Living Supplies Ltd would be significant when conducting their audit procedure. Adequate presentation and sufficient disclosure As an auditor, you should be able to perform the auditing procedures to at least try and evaluate whether the overall presentation contained in the financial records, includes the availed disclosures, and is in accordance with pertained applied financial reporting framework (Whittington Delaney, 2012). In this case, as an auditor for Best Living Supplies Limited when carrying out the audit process, it is important to make presentation and disclosure in a clear and concise way that eases understanding of the auditing report. Evaluating Sufficiency and the accuracy in the Audit Evidence In terms of audit procedure being performed and audit evidence attained, another vital procedure for the auditor should be an evaluation, before they create the conclusion of the auditing process, whether the pertained assessments of the identified risk of material misstatement that has relevant assertion level remain appropriate. The auditor should also be able to conclude whether there is sufficient and appropriate auditing evidence that has been obtained. When developing conclusions, as an auditor you should be able to consider all the relevant auditing evidence, regardless of whether they appear to be in collaboration or contradicting with the assertions of the financial statements (Davies Aston, 2011). If the auditor hasnt been able to attain some sufficient and an appropriate auditing evidence in regards to the relevant levels of assertion, as an auditor you should at least try to develop even further auditing evidence. Even if auditors tend to be unable to obtain derive sufficient auditing evidence, as an auditor you may consider expressing an even better qualified opinion or even disclaiming any opinion in the financial records. Documentation As an auditor of Best Living Supplies Company it tends to be vital to include the following: The overall response that aims at addressing the risks being assessed in terms of material misstatement in the provided financial records provided and actual nature and the extent of the auditing procedures that has been performed. The pertained linkage of these procedures and those assessed risks at the relevant assertion level; and Results of auditing procedures tend to include conclusions, developed such conclusions at times arent otherwise clearer. Auditors should develop the intention of planning for the purpose of using the audit evidence in terms of the operating effectiveness and controls retrieved in the previous audit done; auditors should maintain that they have included in the auditing documentation the pertained conclusions that rely on such controls that were to be tested in the previous audit (Homewood, 2001). In this case, we could make the conclusion based on the previous audit report that was developed by Best Living Supplies Company. Also, as an auditor, it is vital to include that in the audit documentation the basis for any determination not to use the external confirmation procedures for the accounts receivable when the account balance appears material. Hence, the document will have to show that the financial statements agree or either reconcile with set out underlying account records. Recommendation As an auditor, the recommendation that I could provide for Best Living Supplies Company is that when choosing an auditing firm they should entail that the auditors are experienced; this tends to prevent errors from occurring in the audit process. Choosing a professional skepticism team of auditors is also a key step that will ensure efficiency in the levels auditing process. Conclusion This paper tends to provide procedures for the assessment of risks material misstatement concerning financial statement levels and, the auditor's overall feedback affecting the auditor's ability of understanding known control environs. Also, there being an effective control environment usually allows auditors to possess confidence in their internal controls and reliability of the auditing evidence being generated internally and within the assertion and, thus, it allows an auditor to conduct audit form of procedures at the interim date rather than on the period-end (Fairhall, 2010). At times the deficiencies in the control environment, at times tends to have some opposite effects (for instance, an auditor may consider responding to any ineffective control environs by conducting even complex auditing procedures as the period-end rather than the interim date, being obtained in even more extensive audit evidence as from the substantive conditions, and the increasing numbers of locations tend to be included in the auditing scope (Deraison, 2004). As a result, the above discussion tends to be key for auditing procedure. References Basu, S. K. (2009).Fundamentals of auditing. Delhi, Pearson. Cascarino, R., Cascarino, R. (2012).Auditor's guide to IT auditing. Hoboken, N.J., Wiley. Internal auditing fundamentals introduction and study guide. (2016) Ljubljana, The Center of Excellence in Finance. Wright, C. (2016).Fundamentals of information risk management auditing: an introduction for managers and auditors Fairhall, T. (2010).Auditing fundamentals. North Ryde, N.S.W., McGraw-Hill Australia. Russell, J. P., Wilson, S. (2013).Eauditing fundamentals: virtual communication and remote auditing. Parsowith, B. S. (1995).Fundamentals of quality auditing. Milwaukee, Wis, ASQC Quality Press. Von Wielligh, P., Prinsloo, F., Penning, G. (2014).Auditing fundamentals in a South African context. Kunz, R., Hamel, A. (2014).Auditing fundamentals in a South African context: graded questions. Homewood, L. (2001).Auditing fundamentals. Croydon, Vic, Tertiary Press. Davies, M., Aston, J. (2011).Auditing fundamentals. Harlow, England, Financial Times/Prentice Hall. Deraison, R. (2004).Nessus network auditing. Rockland, MA., Syngress. Whittington, R., Delaney, P. R. (2012).Wiley CPA exam review 2012: auditing and attestation. Hoboken, NJ, John Wiley Sons. Saxena, R. G., Srinivas, K., Rai, U., Rai, S. M. (2010).Auditing. Mumbai [India], Himalaya Pub. House.